‘After almost destroying our world, the families are allies’: the thrilling audio series from JFK and Khrushchev’s descendants.

During the month of October 1962, humanity veered closer to ruin more so than ever during modern times. This happened after an American surveillance aircraft identified that Russian atomic missile bases were being assembled on Cuba, less than 160 kilometers off the coast of American soil. In response, U.S. President John F Kennedy directed a naval task force to enact a maritime blockade around the island. The next phase constituted almost two weeks filled with extreme stress.

An Unthinkable Danger

The threat was obvious. If Kennedy, or the Russian opposite, Premier Khrushchev, initiated an attack on their enemy, a cascade involving worldwide atomic attacks followed by retaliatory strikes would have followed, casting civilization into all-out oblivion.

The Cuban missile crisis has been documented endlessly, in volumes, movies, as well as television programmes. But, in its latest installment, a prominent audio documentary series titled "The Bomb" introduces an unprecedented perspective to this historical narrative. It is jointly hosted by Kennedy's relative alongside Nina Khrushcheva, family members belonging to the leaders who, over 13 days, held the fate of the world within their grasp.

"What were the Russians thinking? What were the United States thinking?" questions Khrushcheva, the Soviet leader's descendant and a professor of international affairs.

For her, the unique appeal of the podcast lies in its endeavor to objectively ask: "How can people detest each other to the point they confront each other?"

"I am acutely aware how profound the fact that people can be friends or else have the potential to be total enemies," states Max Kennedy, son of RFK, nephew of the late president and now a writer as well as lawyer. "We see this over and over when countries have gone to war, highlighting the sheer folly involved to engage in warfare."

A Brink of Catastrophe

What is striking about the Cuban missile crisis was that, because it unfolded in the global spotlight, individuals worldwide were able to observe nearly as it happened while it moved closer to catastrophe. Even so, the risk of annihilation was more imminent than anybody understood at the time.

"The overwhelming majority in the White House were advocating for an airstrike followed by an invasion," says Max Kennedy. "If we had struck the Cubans using the Sixth Fleet, there is no question Soviet forces stationed there would've fired a tactical nuclear weapon against the American ships, and that would've obliterated our naval vessels as well as sunk America's primary naval force. And, we would have responded with an overwhelming counterattack that would have ended most life on the planet."

The fact it didn’t highlights the composure of both leaders, they managed to exercise restraint and calmly negotiate when many advisors in their governments was pushing for military action. As a result, The Soviet premier removed the missiles from the Caribbean island while President Kennedy (although not reported at the time) withdrew his similar weapons from NATO ally Turkey. The relief was immense, matched by a feeling of hope.

A Divergent Perspective

Still, during those two weeks in October, the tension was palpable globally. The podcast's co-hosts were born shortly after these events, and Khrushcheva being taught about it via the Soviet education system, which presented a slightly different picture of what happened.

"As you mentioned your parent recalls it, describing it as a frightening day," Khrushcheva notes. "But for Soviet citizens, the public were largely unaware a great deal about it, since it was a tense situation, and in the Soviet Union we were told that things are always fine or positive."

Within Khrushchev’s family, however, the perspective was different. "They told me that it was a triumphant moment it was, because it was eyeball to eyeball. The leaders managed to resolve it, thus didn’t start a global war, seen as a positive outcome," she adds. Later on, though, that perspective would not be shared by everybody. "For a long time within Russian historical analysis, it was considered a failure for the Soviet leader, because he refrained from destroying the United States."

A Unprecedented Partnership

This podcast is so even-handed , well produced so much so that Khrushcheva jokes it almost made her forget the known the ending. This is, in part, thanks to the participation of historians. But, truly, the most groundbreaking aspect remains the participation of the hosts themselves. Even within living memory, it would be unthinkable for descendants of the heads of state of America and USSR would appear side by side. The fact that Max Kennedy and Nina Khrushcheva can do that, and be so warm toward one another, has to be a symbol of hope.

"Max and I aren't the pioneers," smiles Nina. "Following 1991, my uncle Sergey Khrushchev’s son and became great friends with Dwight Eisenhower’s children."

"However we had never met prior to this project," clarifies Kennedy. "Which is a shame because we connected immediately and now we are friends, something that is really great. Finally, after nearly six decades of almost destroying the world, our families have become friends, suggesting the world is more secure, a little bit."

Modern Parallels with Current Perils

Or is it? One reason why The Bomb feels so necessary is that we now are living living through dark times. The symbolic clock of doom is closer to catastrophe than ever before, partly since world leaders appear not to have the capacity to comprehend

Katie Wade
Katie Wade

Elara Vance is a tech futurist and innovation strategist with over a decade of experience in analyzing disruptive technologies and their societal impacts.